Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
Abstract
Computerized grading programs and electronic gradebooks can be useful tools. But in the end, Mr. Guskey reminds us, teachers must still decide what grade offers the most accurate and fairest description of each student's achievement and level of performance.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2002
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208301013
Repository Citation
Guskey, Thomas R., "Computerized Gradebooks and the Myth of Objectivity" (2002). Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology Faculty Publications. 32.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/edp_facpub/32
Included in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Technology Commons
Notes/Citation Information
Published in Phi Delta Kappan, v. 83, issue 10, p. 775-780.
© 2002, Thomas R. Guskey
The copyright holder has granted the permission for posting the article here.