Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a study utilizing a seldom-used method in Library and Information Science (LIS): Qualitative Secondary Analysis. The data is drawn from two phenomenological studies about experiences of Reference and Information Services (RIS) librarians. We discuss how we repurposed the interview data in this study, and also the strengths, weaknesses, and wider applications of the method across LIS.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-2016
Repository Citation
Bossaller, Jenny; Burns, C. Sean; and VanScoy, Amy, "Advancing Research for Library and Information Science with Qualitative Secondary Analysis" (2016). Information Science Faculty Publications. 55.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/slis_facpub/55
Notes/Citation Information
Published in Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, v. 5, p. 593-600.
© ISAST
Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.