Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the possible explanations for the slow adoption and development of online anonymity technology. The ability to remain anonymous while engaging in different activities, online is increasingly sought after by consumers with privacy concerns. Currently, the only way to maintain online anonymity is through the use of technology. This paper reviews and analyzes the tools currently available to consumers to maintain online anonymity. There are only four tools available to consumers to ensure online anonymity: anonymous remailers, rewebbers, The Onion Router (Tor) and the Invisible Internet Project (I2P). These tools provide the protection needed for an Internet user to remain anonymous but suffer from a lack of usability and adoption.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors have selected a few specific online anonymity technologies based on the following criteria: the technology satisfies our full anonymity definition, the technology is currently available for public use and the technology has been academically researched.
Findings
Few anonymity technologies are available for public use that offer the ability for full online anonymity, and these technologies are difficult for the average computer user to operate. Further research is still needed to help determine what the average user wants to see in an anonymity technology as well as ways to help users integrate the technology into their commodity software (such as Web browsers). Future online anonymity technologies should enable the user to decide when, how and with whom their information is shared if it is shared at all with ease and simplicity.
Originality/value
The authors identify, explain and analyze publicly available online anonymity technologies in terms of their usability. The authors identified ways as to how online anonymity technology can be improved to increase public adoption. The authors make pertinent recommendations on how the design and development of online anonymity technology can be improved in the future.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2015
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPCC-08-2015-0030
Repository Citation
Winkler, Stephanie and Zeadally, Sherali, "An Analysis of Tools for Online Anonymity" (2015). Information Science Faculty Publications. 20.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/slis_facpub/20
Included in
Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons
Notes/Citation Information
Published in International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, v. 11, no. 4, p. 436-453.
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
The copyright holder has granted the permission for posting the article here.
The document available for download is the authors' post-peer-review final draft of the article.