Satellite Symposium 2: Silage
Description
Grass forage in Latvia is the main and inexpensive cow feed, however its composition and nutritive value differ during the growth period of grasses. The traits of grasses, their natural ensilage capacity, count of epiphytic microflora, the timing of harvest and ensilage making technology affecting the quality of grass silage are important issues to be studied. Silage making for the winter period is the treatment of green material to minimise the breakdown of nutrients being the results of biochemical and microbiological processes. The aim of the research was to clarify the methodologies to reduce the count of epiphytic microflora and CFU count of microorganisms in grass silage and improve fermentation quality (Woolford, 1998; Wilkinson, 1999).
Citation
Osmane, B. and Blūzmanis, J., "Correlation Between Epiphytic Microflora and Microbial Pollution and Fermentation Quality of Silage Made From Grasses" (2023). IGC Proceedings (1993-2023). 1.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/20/satellitesymposium2/1
Included in
Agricultural Science Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, Plant Pathology Commons, Soil Science Commons, Weed Science Commons
Correlation Between Epiphytic Microflora and Microbial Pollution and Fermentation Quality of Silage Made From Grasses
Grass forage in Latvia is the main and inexpensive cow feed, however its composition and nutritive value differ during the growth period of grasses. The traits of grasses, their natural ensilage capacity, count of epiphytic microflora, the timing of harvest and ensilage making technology affecting the quality of grass silage are important issues to be studied. Silage making for the winter period is the treatment of green material to minimise the breakdown of nutrients being the results of biochemical and microbiological processes. The aim of the research was to clarify the methodologies to reduce the count of epiphytic microflora and CFU count of microorganisms in grass silage and improve fermentation quality (Woolford, 1998; Wilkinson, 1999).
