Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3290-8197

Date Available

12-13-2026

Year of Publication

2024

Document Type

Doctoral Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

College

Education

Department/School/Program

Special Education

Advisor

Dr. Kera Ackerman

Abstract

Questionnaires are commonly used to capture stakeholder experiences and perceptions of paraeducator assignment practices. Unfortunately, many existing questionnaires lack rigorous development and essential psychometric properties. Additionally, they frequently focus on single aspects of the construct within a small sample or geographic area. These limitations impact the validity, reliability, utility, and generalizability of findings needed to understand paraeducator assignment practices in special education. This sequential exploratory mixed methods study employed systematic procedures for questionnaire design outlined by Artino and colleagues (2014), including (1) a literature review, (2) a focus group, (3) a synthesis and comparative analysis of the literature review, and focus group, (4) questionnaire design and development of items, and (5) ratings and feedback through expert judgment to design, develop, and validate a questionnaire to examine special educators' experiences and perceptions of paraeducator assignment practices. This study's extensive focus on systematic construction, careful attention to validity, and iterative assessment at various stages of questionnaire development set a new standard for ensuring the highest quality of instrument development in paraeducator scholarship. Results across all qualitative and quantitative indicators showed that the designed questionnaire is a comprehensive and implementable instrument, demonstrating appropriate validity. Future implications and research are discussed.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2024.494

Available for download on Sunday, December 13, 2026

Share

COinS