Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Abstract

In response to questions being asked by tobacco growers about the effectiveness of sulfate of potash magnesia (SPM; 21% K2O and 11% Mg) as coinpared to sulfate of potash (SP; 50% K2O), field studies were conducted during 1993-1994 to compare the two potassium (K) sources for use on burley tobacco. Any effect of SPM on yield of tobacco should be due to Mg since the only difference between the two sources in kind of nutrient contained is the presence of magnesium (Mg) in SPM. To compare the two K sources, we selected field sites low enough in soil test K levels that normally would result in increased tobacco yields due to application of fertilizer K.

Publication Date

1995

Volume

16

Number

5

Included in

Soil Science Commons

Share

COinS