Abstract
Current knowledge of yield potential and best agronomic management practices for perennial bioenergy grasses is primarily derived from small‐scale and short‐term studies, yet these studies inform policy at the national scale. In an effort to learn more about how bioenergy grasses perform across multiple locations and years, the U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE)/Sun Grant Initiative Regional Feedstock Partnership was initiated in 2008. The objectives of the Feedstock Partnership were to (1) provide a wide range of information for feedstock selection (species choice) and management practice options for a variety of regions and (2) develop national maps of potential feedstock yield for each of the herbaceous species evaluated. The Feedstock Partnership expands our previous understanding of the bioenergy potential of switchgrass, Miscanthus, sorghum, energycane, and prairie mixtures on Conservation Reserve Program land by conducting long‐term, replicated trials of each species at diverse environments in the U.S. Trials were initiated between 2008 and 2010 and completed between 2012 and 2015 depending on species. Field‐scale plots were utilized for switchgrass and Conservation Reserve Program trials to use traditional agricultural machinery. This is important as we know that the smaller scale studies often overestimated yield potential of some of these species. Insufficient vegetative propagules of energycane and Miscanthus prohibited farm‐scale trials of these species. The Feedstock Partnership studies also confirmed that environmental differences across years and across sites had a large impact on biomass production. Nitrogen application had variable effects across feedstocks, but some nitrogen fertilizer generally had a positive effect. National yield potential maps were developed using PRISM‐ELM for each species in the Feedstock Partnership. This manuscript, with the accompanying supplemental data, will be useful in making decisions about feedstock selection as well as agronomic practices across a wide region of the country.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-2018
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12493
Funding Information
This research was supported by funding from the North Central Regional Sun Grant Center at South Dakota State University through a grant provided by the US Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office under award number DE-FC36- 05GO85041.
Related Content
Additional Supporting Information may be found online in the supporting information tab for this article.
Repository Citation
Lee, Do Kyoung; Aberle, Ezra; Anderson, Erik K.; Anderson, William; Baldwin, Brian S.; Baltensperger, David; Barrett, Michael; Blumenthal, Jürg; Bonos, Stacy; Bouton, Joe; Bransby, David I.; Brummer, Charlie; Burks, Pane S.; Chen, Chengci; Daly, Christopher; Egenolf, Josh; Farris, Rodney L.; Fike, John H.; Gaussoin, Roch; Gill, John R.; Gravois, Kenneth; Halbleib, Michael D.; Hale, Anna; Hanna, Wayne; Harmoney, Keith; Heaton, Emily A.; Heiniger, Ron W.; Hoffman, Lindsey; Hong, Chang O.; Kakani, Gopal; Williams, David; and Williams, Linda, "Biomass Production of Herbaceous Energy Crops in the United States: Field Trial Results and Yield Potential Maps from the Multiyear Regional Feedstock Partnership" (2018). Plant and Soil Sciences Faculty Publications. 111.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_facpub/111
Supporting Information: Table S1.
gcbb12493-sup-0002-tables2.xlsx (26 kB)
Supporting Information: Table S2.
gcbb12493-sup-0003-tables3.xlsx (58 kB)
Supporting Information: Table S3.
gcbb12493-sup-0004-tables4.xlsx (54 kB)
Supporting Information: Table S4.
gcbb12493-sup-0005-tables5.xlsx (59 kB)
Supporting Information: Table S5.
Notes/Citation Information
Published in Global Change Biology Bioenergy, v. 10, issue 10, p. 698-716.
© 2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Bioenergy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Due to the large number of authors, only the first 30 and the authors affiliated with the University of Kentucky are listed in the author section above. For the complete list of authors, please download this article or visit: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12493