Coalition building and citizen science for radon risk reduction

Authors

• Stacy Stanifer, University of KentuckyFollow
• Kathy Rademacher, University of KentuckyFollow
• Whitney Sedio, University of Kentucky
• Naomi Cheek, University of Kentucky
• David Gross, Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center
• Caitlyn Curtis, Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center
• Amanda Thaxton-Wiggins, University of KentuckyFollow
• Mary Kay Rayens, University of KentuckyFollow
• Ellen J. Hahn, University of KentuckyFollow

Abstract

We evaluated the implementation of local coalitions led in partnership with citizen scientists, community-based organizations, and public libraries in four rural communities to lower exposure to radon in the home. The objectives were to (1) describe the Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) of four radon coalitions, and (2) compare RE-AIM factors among citizen scientists who participated in the coalitions and those who did not. A larger community-engaged research project embedded coalition building using a citizen science approach. Three of the four coalitions focused on health and wellness more broadly (18–34 members); one focused solely on radon (10 members). Coalition membership and activities varied from marketing a radon detector Library Loan Program, community events, and in-library tabling events to working with government officials to sign National Radon Action Month proclamations. We used mixed methods to evaluate coalition-building using the RE-AIM framework. The coalitions were most likely to reach local health departments, hospitals, and schools. Although these partners were highly supportive, they provided few to no resources. Four in 10 citizen scientists were at least moderately involved in the coalition regardless of whether they had high home radon. Citizen scientists reported low awareness of both how frequently radon received local media attention and how favorably radon awareness, testing, and mitigation was portrayed in local media, particularly among those uninvolved in the coalition. Citizen scientists involved in the coalition had the most experience disseminating scientific information on radon and educating the public. The coalitions fostered radon mitigation as 82% of library loan participants with high radon were likely to hire a radon mitigation professional, and all said financial assistance would help them mitigate. Multi-issue health coalitions that engage citizen scientists and partner with public libraries can increase radon testing and build demand for mitigation in rural areas.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2026

Notes/Citation Information

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/ae4e50

Funding Information

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institute of Health under Award Number R01ES030380. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health

Repository Citation

Stanifer, Stacy; Rademacher, Kathy; Sedio, Whitney; Cheek, Naomi; Gross, David; Curtis, Caitlyn; Thaxton-Wiggins, Amanda; Rayens, Mary Kay; and Hahn, Ellen J., "Coalition building and citizen science for radon risk reduction" (2026). Nursing Faculty Publications. 81.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/nursing_facpub/81