Abstract

Candida albicans, an opportunistic fungal pathogen, is a significant cause of human infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. Phenotypic plasticity between two morphological phenotypes, yeast and hyphae, is a key mechanism by which C. albicans can thrive in many microenvironments and cause disease in the host. Understanding the decision points and key driver genes controlling this important transition and how these genes respond to different environmental signals is critical to understanding how C. albicans causes infections in the host. Here we build and analyze a Boolean dynamical model of the C. albicans yeast to hyphal transition, integrating multiple environmental factors and regulatory mechanisms. We validate the model by a systematic comparison to prior experiments, which led to agreement in 17 out of 22 cases. The discrepancies motivate alternative hypotheses that are testable by follow-up experiments. Analysis of this model revealed two time-constrained windows of opportunity that must be met for the complete transition from the yeast to hyphal phenotype, as well as control strategies that can robustly prevent this transition. We experimentally validate two of these control predictions in C. albicans strains lacking the transcription factor UME6 and the histone deacetylase HDA1, respectively. This model will serve as a strong base from which to develop a systems biology understanding of C. albicans morphogenesis.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-29-2021

Notes/Citation Information

Published in PLOS Computational Biology, v. 17, issue 3, e1008690.

© 2021 Wooten et al.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008690

Funding Information

This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) grants PHY 1545832, MCB-1715826, and IIS-1814405 to R.A., National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) award R35GM124594 to C.J.N., and the Kamangar family in the form of an endowed chair to C.J.N. R.L. was partially supported by NIH grants R011AI135128, U01EB024501, and R01GM127909, and NSF grant CBET-1750183. A.D.B. was supported by NIH grants R01DE013986 and R01GM127909.

pcbi.1008690.s001.tif (545 kB)
S1 Fig. Feedback vertex set control. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008690.s001

pcbi.1008690.s002.tif (804 kB)
S2 Fig. Novel attractors following single-node control. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008690.s002

pcbi.1008690.s003.docx (18 kB)
S1 Table. Model validation by comparison with literature. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008690.s003

pcbi.1008690.s004.docx (18 kB)
S1 Text. Explanation of the regulatory functions of the model. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008690.s004

pcbi.1008690.s005.txt (1 kB)
S1 File. The YHT model in BooleanNet format. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008690.s005

pcbi.1008690.s006.zip (1 kB)
S2 File. The YHT model in SBML qual file format. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008690.s006

pcbi.1008690.s007.xlsx (53 kB)
S3 File. Attractors following single-node control. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008690.s007

Share

COinS