Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
As Justice Should be Blind, So Should We: Analyzing the Federal Judicial Center’s Reports on Cameras in the Courtroom and an Argument in Favor of Keeping Cameras Out of the Supreme Court
Document Type
Blog Post
Publication Date
10-23-2018
As Justice Should be Blind, So Should We_ _Analyzing the Federal Judicial Center’s Reports on Cameras in the Courtroom and an Argument in Favor of Keeping Cameras Out of the Supreme Court – Kentucky Law Journal.pdf (159 kB)
As Justice Should be Blind, So Should We: Analyzing the Federal Judicial Center’s Reports on Cameras in the Courtroom and an Argument in Favor of Keeping Cameras Out of the Supreme Court – Kentucky Law Journal
As Justice Should be Blind, So Should We: Analyzing the Federal Judicial Center’s Reports on Cameras in the Courtroom and an Argument in Favor of Keeping Cameras Out of the Supreme Court – Kentucky Law Journal
Notes/Citation Information
Justin Austin Hatfield, As Justice Should be Blind, So Should We: Analyzing the Federal Judicial Center's Reports on Cameras in the Courtroom and an Argument in Favor of Keeping Cameras Out of the Supreme Court, The KLJ Blog (October 23, 2018), https://perma.cc/B9WJ-4QH3.