Description
Native warm-season grasses (NWSG) can produce high quality forage and high rates of gain for beef cattle. However, little data is available on how NWSG affect the productivity of cow-calf operations on a farm scale. Therefore, we implemented an experiment at three sites, Booneville, AR, Linneus, MO and Louisville, TN, with cow-calf pairs (mature cows over ≥ 3 years old, spring calving). We evaluated two forage systems that mix either a drought or drought/flood tolerant native C4 species [big bluestem (BB) blend or eastern gamagrass (EG)] with a cool-season perennial, tall fescue (TF), and compared them to the most frequently used forage system within the Fescue Belt region, one that relies on TF only. The TN study site contains EG, with big bluestem at the MO site, and both big bluestem and EG at the AR site. Cattle (n = 12 pairs per experimental unit) were weighed yearly before initial grazing and again after final removal. Forage samples (n = 15) were collected at the beginning of grazing and once every twenty-eight days during the grazing season, and finally, at the conclusion of grazing. Harvested forages were tested for forage nutritive content (CP, NDF, ADF) using NIRS. Hay produced per forage system was documented by counting bales and weights of subsamples. The AR site was not able to participate in the first year of the study. Overall, there were no statistical differences between treatments in the first grazing season for either cattle or forage measures. However, cattle spent less time on NWSG in 2021 at the TN site to enable renovation of EG to be completed. Also, TF stands had a significant proportion of volunteer warm-season grasses within the pastures. Data from the second year of the study are currently under analysis.
Included in
Agricultural Science Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, Plant Pathology Commons, Soil Science Commons, Weed Science Commons
Preliminary Results: Complementary C4:C3 Grazing Systems
Native warm-season grasses (NWSG) can produce high quality forage and high rates of gain for beef cattle. However, little data is available on how NWSG affect the productivity of cow-calf operations on a farm scale. Therefore, we implemented an experiment at three sites, Booneville, AR, Linneus, MO and Louisville, TN, with cow-calf pairs (mature cows over ≥ 3 years old, spring calving). We evaluated two forage systems that mix either a drought or drought/flood tolerant native C4 species [big bluestem (BB) blend or eastern gamagrass (EG)] with a cool-season perennial, tall fescue (TF), and compared them to the most frequently used forage system within the Fescue Belt region, one that relies on TF only. The TN study site contains EG, with big bluestem at the MO site, and both big bluestem and EG at the AR site. Cattle (n = 12 pairs per experimental unit) were weighed yearly before initial grazing and again after final removal. Forage samples (n = 15) were collected at the beginning of grazing and once every twenty-eight days during the grazing season, and finally, at the conclusion of grazing. Harvested forages were tested for forage nutritive content (CP, NDF, ADF) using NIRS. Hay produced per forage system was documented by counting bales and weights of subsamples. The AR site was not able to participate in the first year of the study. Overall, there were no statistical differences between treatments in the first grazing season for either cattle or forage measures. However, cattle spent less time on NWSG in 2021 at the TN site to enable renovation of EG to be completed. Also, TF stands had a significant proportion of volunteer warm-season grasses within the pastures. Data from the second year of the study are currently under analysis.
