Publication Date
1997
Description
This experiment was conducted with the aim of studying whether the frequency and intensity of defoliation of the temperate grass fromental (Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) Presl.) affected its total dry matter (DM)/ha yield as well as the seasonal distribution of forage. Plots were seeded in 1988 and data collected from 1989 to 1991. Two frequencies and two intensities of defoliation were combined in a two factor randomized complete block design with six replications. Treatment plots were cut each year from early autumn to late spring. ANVA, Tukey and Dunnett tests were applied to find out differences between treatments and between treatments and control. Statistical significance was assumed at p<0.05. For the environmental conditions of this experiment cutting intervals were consistently responsible for differences in total DM yield: BI and BII were superior. The more productive treatment (BI) differed from those of better forage seasonal distribution (AI and AII).
Citation
D'Angelo, G H.; Postulka, E B.; and Ferrari, L, "Defoliation Frequency and Intensity of Arrhenathherum elatius" (2024). IGC Proceedings (1993-2023). 38.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/1997/session22/38
Included in
Agricultural Science Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, Plant Pathology Commons, Soil Science Commons, Weed Science Commons
Defoliation Frequency and Intensity of Arrhenathherum elatius
This experiment was conducted with the aim of studying whether the frequency and intensity of defoliation of the temperate grass fromental (Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) Presl.) affected its total dry matter (DM)/ha yield as well as the seasonal distribution of forage. Plots were seeded in 1988 and data collected from 1989 to 1991. Two frequencies and two intensities of defoliation were combined in a two factor randomized complete block design with six replications. Treatment plots were cut each year from early autumn to late spring. ANVA, Tukey and Dunnett tests were applied to find out differences between treatments and between treatments and control. Statistical significance was assumed at p<0.05. For the environmental conditions of this experiment cutting intervals were consistently responsible for differences in total DM yield: BI and BII were superior. The more productive treatment (BI) differed from those of better forage seasonal distribution (AI and AII).
