Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Publication Date

1997

Location

Manitoba and Saskatchewan

Description

Fertilization may have a positive effect in improving forage quantity and quality in natural meadows of Tierra del Fuego. The objective of the present study was to estimate N-P-S fertilizer effects on forage quality. The trial was set up in 1994 on an Entic Haploborol soil characterized by low P availability (12 ppm, Truog), high N content (1.5% total N) and medium acudity (pH 5.9). A Complete Randomized Split Plot Design was used and N-P2O5-S nutrients were applied at a rate of 120-100-50 kg.ha-1 . Monthly mowing began in January and finished in April 1995. CP and IVDMD were determined. CP content was significatively higher for any of the N-treatments, but no P or S effects were found. Within harvest dates, January and February differed from March and April. No interactions were found between fertilizer treatments and harvest dates.

Share

COinS
 

N-P-S Fertilizer Effects on Brute Protein Content in a Native Meadow in Tierra Del Fuego

Manitoba and Saskatchewan

Fertilization may have a positive effect in improving forage quantity and quality in natural meadows of Tierra del Fuego. The objective of the present study was to estimate N-P-S fertilizer effects on forage quality. The trial was set up in 1994 on an Entic Haploborol soil characterized by low P availability (12 ppm, Truog), high N content (1.5% total N) and medium acudity (pH 5.9). A Complete Randomized Split Plot Design was used and N-P2O5-S nutrients were applied at a rate of 120-100-50 kg.ha-1 . Monthly mowing began in January and finished in April 1995. CP and IVDMD were determined. CP content was significatively higher for any of the N-treatments, but no P or S effects were found. Within harvest dates, January and February differed from March and April. No interactions were found between fertilizer treatments and harvest dates.