Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Publication Date

1993

Location

New Zealand

Description

Uptake of elemental sulphur {S, 50% 75-150 µm and 50% 150-250 µm diameter) or sulphate (applied as gypsum) by pasture in the field was examined using 3 rates of application in autumn or spring on 2 low S­retentive soils; u free-draining pumice soil and a slow-draining gley soil. About 90% of the el��mental S was oxidised to plant-available sulphate during I year after application. On the pumice soil, the apparent recovery of added S was greatest from autumn-applied elemental S. Leaching appeared to reduce the effectiveness of sulphate fertiliser. On the gley soil, sulphate was more effective in enhancing pasture production during the first 12-18 months and the apparent recovery of added S was greatest from spring-applied sulphate.

Share

COinS
 

Effectiveness of Sulphate and Elemental Sulphur Fertilizers Applied to Pastures in Autumn or Spring

New Zealand

Uptake of elemental sulphur {S, 50% 75-150 µm and 50% 150-250 µm diameter) or sulphate (applied as gypsum) by pasture in the field was examined using 3 rates of application in autumn or spring on 2 low S­retentive soils; u free-draining pumice soil and a slow-draining gley soil. About 90% of the el��mental S was oxidised to plant-available sulphate during I year after application. On the pumice soil, the apparent recovery of added S was greatest from autumn-applied elemental S. Leaching appeared to reduce the effectiveness of sulphate fertiliser. On the gley soil, sulphate was more effective in enhancing pasture production during the first 12-18 months and the apparent recovery of added S was greatest from spring-applied sulphate.