Session 8: Improved Grassland Machanization and Cropping Systems Including a Section Dealing with Improved Research Techniques for Laboratory and Field Evaluation of Forages

Publication Date

1985

Location

Kyoto Japan

Description

The prediction of the nutritive value of fresh herbage in the UK is currently based on the measurement of modified acid detergent fibre (MADF). The prediction equations used are derived from in vivo measurements made up to 1969. Subsequently Barber et al. (1984) published data on the suitability of a range of predictors indicating the superiority of the neutral detergent fibre cellulase (NCD) technique over MADF. However, this information was based on experiments carried out in one laboratory and variability between laboratories in the measurement of the predictor is an important factor when deciding which predictor is most suitable for use on a national basis. A ring test was therefore undertaken comparing within and between laboratory variability for both MADF and NCD. Between laboratory variability was greater for NCD than MADF, however when this was built into the standard error of prediction, NCD remained a superior predictor of both digestible organic matter content and metabolisable energy. The new equations provide a similar prediction to those currently in use in the UK at high DOMD contents, but predict approximatery 5 % units higher at low DOMD contents, eg. 65 % instead of 60 %. This would have considerable impact on established advice, particularly that given in relation to silage making.

Share

COinS
 

Prediction of the Nutritive Value of Fresh Herbage in the UK

Kyoto Japan

The prediction of the nutritive value of fresh herbage in the UK is currently based on the measurement of modified acid detergent fibre (MADF). The prediction equations used are derived from in vivo measurements made up to 1969. Subsequently Barber et al. (1984) published data on the suitability of a range of predictors indicating the superiority of the neutral detergent fibre cellulase (NCD) technique over MADF. However, this information was based on experiments carried out in one laboratory and variability between laboratories in the measurement of the predictor is an important factor when deciding which predictor is most suitable for use on a national basis. A ring test was therefore undertaken comparing within and between laboratory variability for both MADF and NCD. Between laboratory variability was greater for NCD than MADF, however when this was built into the standard error of prediction, NCD remained a superior predictor of both digestible organic matter content and metabolisable energy. The new equations provide a similar prediction to those currently in use in the UK at high DOMD contents, but predict approximatery 5 % units higher at low DOMD contents, eg. 65 % instead of 60 %. This would have considerable impact on established advice, particularly that given in relation to silage making.