Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Publication Date

1981

Description

Mefluidide treatment of Kentucky 31 tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) in the spring will inhibit seed-head formation, maintain the forage in an immature and vegetative stage, and increase forage N and soluble-sugar content and in-vivo nutrient utilization in the ovine. Productivity of animals grazing mefluidide-treated tall fescue, however, has not been determined. The objective of this study was to evaluate agronomic characteristics of forage and productivity of yearling beef steers and heifers grazing mefluidide-treated (T) and nontreated control (C) pastures of Kentucky 31 tall fescue. Experimental pastures of Kentucky 31 tall fescue ( 4 replications at location I and one replication at location II) were used to determine the effect of a spring application of 273 .8 g mefluidide/ha on forage N, forage soluble sugars, and animal gain at 28-day intervals in two 140-day grazing seasons.

Mefluidide-treated forage had higher (P < 0.05) N content than the control on days 56, 84, and 112 of the grazing season in both years. Forage soluble-sugar content of treated fescue was greater (P < 0.05) than that of the control on days 28, 56, and 112 of the first year's grazing season and greater (P < 0.05) on day 28 of the second year. Animal gain from grazing treated forage was increased 9%, 22%, 380%, and 21 % over control for Oto 28-, 28 to 56-, 56 to 84-, and 84 to 112-day periods, respec­tively. Combining gain data and analyses for forage treatment, year, location, and 2- and 3-way interactions produced a positive (P < 0.01) effect for mefluidide treatment. Mefluidide treatment of Kentucky 31 tall fescue inhibited seed-head formation, increased forage N and forage soluble-sugar content, and produced a forage that was more efficiently utilized by grazing animals than nontreated forage. This treatment resulted in a 27% increase in animal productivity/ha.

Archival?

Archival

Share

COinS
 

Beef Production from Tall Fescue Treated with Mefluidide A Chemical Plant-Growth Regulator

Mefluidide treatment of Kentucky 31 tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) in the spring will inhibit seed-head formation, maintain the forage in an immature and vegetative stage, and increase forage N and soluble-sugar content and in-vivo nutrient utilization in the ovine. Productivity of animals grazing mefluidide-treated tall fescue, however, has not been determined. The objective of this study was to evaluate agronomic characteristics of forage and productivity of yearling beef steers and heifers grazing mefluidide-treated (T) and nontreated control (C) pastures of Kentucky 31 tall fescue. Experimental pastures of Kentucky 31 tall fescue ( 4 replications at location I and one replication at location II) were used to determine the effect of a spring application of 273 .8 g mefluidide/ha on forage N, forage soluble sugars, and animal gain at 28-day intervals in two 140-day grazing seasons.

Mefluidide-treated forage had higher (P < 0.05) N content than the control on days 56, 84, and 112 of the grazing season in both years. Forage soluble-sugar content of treated fescue was greater (P < 0.05) than that of the control on days 28, 56, and 112 of the first year's grazing season and greater (P < 0.05) on day 28 of the second year. Animal gain from grazing treated forage was increased 9%, 22%, 380%, and 21 % over control for Oto 28-, 28 to 56-, 56 to 84-, and 84 to 112-day periods, respec­tively. Combining gain data and analyses for forage treatment, year, location, and 2- and 3-way interactions produced a positive (P < 0.01) effect for mefluidide treatment. Mefluidide treatment of Kentucky 31 tall fescue inhibited seed-head formation, increased forage N and forage soluble-sugar content, and produced a forage that was more efficiently utilized by grazing animals than nontreated forage. This treatment resulted in a 27% increase in animal productivity/ha.