Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Presenter Information

Publication Date

1977

Description

It was shown that large varietal differences in voluntary intake occur even· when there were no differences in dry matter digestibility and level of pepsin soluble dry matter. To over­come this problem when comparing different methods of predicting intake the use of multiple regressions was proposed in which dry matter digestibility was always one of the two independ­ent variables. Using this method leaf % was shown to be the best predictor of intake (r = 0.87) closely followed by physical attrib­utes of the feed. It was concluded that more time should be spent studying the physical factors in pastures that control intake and that less reliance should be placed on chemical analysis.

Archival?

Archival

Share

COinS
 

Predicting forage intake by laboratory methods

It was shown that large varietal differences in voluntary intake occur even· when there were no differences in dry matter digestibility and level of pepsin soluble dry matter. To over­come this problem when comparing different methods of predicting intake the use of multiple regressions was proposed in which dry matter digestibility was always one of the two independ­ent variables. Using this method leaf % was shown to be the best predictor of intake (r = 0.87) closely followed by physical attrib­utes of the feed. It was concluded that more time should be spent studying the physical factors in pastures that control intake and that less reliance should be placed on chemical analysis.