Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
Date Available
7-28-2016
Year of Publication
2016
Document Type
Graduate Capstone Project
Degree Name
Doctor of Nursing Practice
Faculty
Dr. Carol Thompson
Faculty
Dr. Sarah Lester
Abstract
Aim and Objective: To determine if the implementation of a post-discharge call-back intervention for patients discharged home from the hospital after stroke was associated with a decrease in 30-day readmissions and improved patient satisfaction.
Background: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States (American Stroke Association, 2015). Several studies have examined various post-discharge interventions, including a call to the patient and/or family after their return home, to determine the benefit to patients, if any (Zolfaghari, Mousavifar, Pedram & Haghani (2012). Understanding and anticipating patient needs and removing barriers post-stroke may decrease readmission rates as well as increase patient satisfaction with their hospital experience.
Design: A retrospective chart review examining pre-and post-intervention scores for patient satisfaction and 30-day readmissions for stroke patients who received post-discharge call backs from registered nurses (RNs).
Methods: The principal investigator gathered data points from the Stroke Coordinator to assess patient satisfaction utilizing Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores. The principal investigator collected re-admission and demographic data from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR).
Findings: Overall pooled patient satisfaction scores improved from 73.6 percentile in the pre-intervention, to 78.8 percentile in the post-intervention. This number was not statistically significant, but an overall increase was nonetheless noted. Readmission rates declined slightly, 3.3% to 2.7 %, but again there was no statistical significance. Desired p-value was <0.05 for this quality improvement project.
Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, an overall improvement in patient satisfaction was noted, as well as an overall decrease in readmission rates, suggesting that a call-back intervention could benefit patients in their transition after stroke. Recommended future steps for this quality improvement project include creating stream-lined electronic data collection tools for call-backs to enable ongoing monitoring of compliance and further explore quality improvement measures.
Recommended Citation
Clark, Taylor E., "Do Call-Backs Help Patients Post Stroke" (2016). DNP Projects. 96.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/dnp_etds/96
