Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Date Available

5-7-2015

Year of Publication

2015

Document Type

Graduate Capstone Project

Degree Name

Doctor of Nursing Practice

Faculty

Dr. Nancy R. Kloha

Faculty

Dr. Tamara Wellman

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate provider adherence to the ADA’s recommendation for an annual screening urinary albumin excretion level to check for the presence of microalbuminuria. A secondary objective was to assess for adequate treatment (i.e. ACE inhibitor or ARB prescription) in those patients with microalbuminuria present.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 60 randomly selected patients seen within a primary care practice in an urban university setting between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2014. Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 18 years and an active diagnosis of type 2 DM as evidenced by ICD codes 250.00-250.93. Data collected included age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, insurance type, BMI, tobacco use status, presence or absence of a urinary albumin excretion level collected within the specified timeframe, and presence or absence of an active ACE inhibitor/ARB prescription. A database of 972 qualifying patients was provided by the university’s Division of Biomedical Informatics and 60 patients were randomly sampled from this database utilizing a random number generator.

Results: The retrospective chart review demonstrated that only 1 out of the 60 charts reviewed had received screening for microalbuminuria within the previous calendar year, as recommended by the national guidelines.

Conclusion: Increasing urinary albumin excretion rate screening is essential in early recognition and management of renal complications in patients with type 2 DM. Current rates in many practice settings appear to be suboptimal and there exists an opportunity for quality improvement and identifying strategies for improving screening rates.

Share

COinS