Abstract

In this paper we explore whether countries led by women have fared better during the COVID-19 pandemic than those led by men. Media and public health officials have lauded the perceived gender-related influence on policies and strategies for reducing the deleterious effects of the pandemic. We examine this proposition by analyzing COVID-19-related deaths globally across countries led by men and women. While we find some limited support for lower reported fatality rates in countries led by women, they are not statistically significant. Country cultural values offer more substantive explanation for COVID-19 outcomes. We offer several potential explanations for the pervasive perception that countries led by women have fared better during the pandemic, including data selection bias and Western media bias that amplified the successes of women leaders in OECD countries.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-31-2020

Notes/Citation Information

Published in PLOS ONE, v. 15, issue 12, e0244531.

© 2020 Windsor et al.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244531

Related Content

All files for "Gender in the time of COVID-19: Evaluating national leadership and COVID-19 fatalities" are available from the Harvard Dataverse (https://dataverse.harvard.edu/privateurl.xhtml?token=8512501d-2187-448d-9c10-ae2822567d7c).

pone.0244531.s001.docx (50 kB)
S1 Appendix https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244531.s001

Share

COinS