Abstract
Background
Breast cancer treatments often result in upper extremity functional limitations in both the short and long term. Current evidence makes comparisons against a baseline or contralateral limb, but does not consider changes in function associated with aging.
Objective
The objective of this study was to compare upper extremity function between women treated for breast cancer more than 12 months in the past and women without cancer.
Design
This was an observational cross-sectional study.
Methods
Women who were diagnosed with breast cancer and had a mean post-surgical treatment time of 51 months (range = 12–336 months) were compared with women who did not have breast cancer (CTRL group). Self-reported upper extremity function using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and shoulder range of motion, strength, and muscular endurance were measured. Participants were divided into 3 groups: breast cancer involving the nondominant limb (BC-ND), breast cancer involving the dominant limb (BC-DOM), and CTRL.
Results
A total of 59 women in the CTRL group, 23 women in the BC-ND group, and 28 women in the BC-DOM group completed measures. Mean DASH scores in women with breast cancer were higher than those of women in the CTRL group, regardless of the limb on which cancer occurred (Cohen d = 1.13; 95% CI = 2.20 to 16.21) Range of motion for the BC-ND group was significantly less for flexion (Cohen d = 1.19, 95% CI = −13.08 to −0.11) and external rotation (Cohen d = 1.11, 95% CI = −18.62 to −1.98) compared with the CTRL group. Strength in the BC-ND group was 23% to 25% lower in the CTRL group for external (Cohen’s d = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.12) and internal rotation (Cohen d = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.13). Endurance was not significantly different in the 3 groups.
Limitations
Some participants had rehabilitation, which may have skewed results. The range of post–surgical treatment times was broad, making it difficult to determine when function returned. Muscular endurance measures demonstrated a ceiling effect and large variance, limiting the ability to distinguish differences among participants. These results may not be generalizable to the subset of women who were treated with lumpectomy, sentinel node biopsy, or chest wall radiation alone or who underwent a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
Conclusion
In the long term, women with breast cancer have lower self-reported shoulder function than women without breast cancer. Motion and strength are lower among women who have experienced cancer on the nondominant limb.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-7-2020
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa015
Related Content
This study is adapted in part from “A Comparison of Upper Extremity Function Between Female Breast Cancer Survivors and Health Controls: Typical Self-Report of Function, Motion, Strength and Muscular Endurance,” which was submitted by M.I. Fisher in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Rehabilitation Sciences at the College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Repository Citation
Fisher, Mary Insana; Capilouto, Gilson J.; Malone, Terry; Bush, Heather M.; and Uhl, Timothy L., "Comparison of Upper Extremity Function in Women With and Women Without a History of Breast Cancer" (2020). Communication Sciences and Disorders Faculty Publications. 1.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/csd_facpub/1
Included in
Biostatistics Commons, Communication Sciences and Disorders Commons, Physical Therapy Commons
Notes/Citation Information
Published in Physical Therapy.
© 2020 American Physical Therapy Association
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Physical Therapy following peer review. The version of record, Mary Insana Fisher, Gilson Capilouto, Terry Malone, Heather Bush, Timothy L Uhl, Comparison of Upper Extremity Function in Women With and Women Without a History of Breast Cancer, Physical Therapy, pzaa015, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa015