Abstract
Open access publishing is continuing to grow as funders such as cOAlition S, National Institutes of Health, and the White House implement mandates and requirements that publicly funded research be made immediately available for public consumption. Publishers have adopted open access as a business model through transformative agreements that combine subscription and publishing fees. However, it is unclear whether these agreements are beneficial for libraries. This article discusses a project by the University of Kentucky Libraries to gather and analyze open access publication data to aid in the evaluation of transformative agreement proposals. This article also discusses how the University of Kentucky compares to peer institutions in the Southeastern Conference and other benchmark institutions regarding open access publishing output. Additionally, this article discusses downsides of transformative agreements and highlights promising alternatives.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-2024
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.5860/lrts.68n1.8211
Repository Citation
Rawlins, Ben, "Are Transformative Agreements Worth It? An Analysis of Open Access Publication Data at the University of Kentucky" (2024). Library Faculty and Staff Publications. 341.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_facpub/341
Notes/Citation Information
Rawlins, B. (2024). Are Transformative Agreements Worth It? An Analysis of Open Access Publication Data at the University of Kentucky. Library Resources and Technical Services, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.68n1.8211