•  
  •  

UKnowledge > College of Medicine > Heart & Vascular > The VAD Journal > Vol. 2 (2016)

 

Peer Reviewed

1

Publication Date

3-3-2016

Document Type

Original Research

Abstract

Background: Driveline infections (DLI) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in ventricular assist device (VAD) recipients. We compared driveline infection (DLI) rate after an institutional change in driveline management protocol.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of left VAD recipients at our institution, based on driveline management. Group 1: daily driveline dressing change consisting of chlorhexidine cleansing, sterile 4x4 gauze, and use of an abdominal binder. Group 2: Dressing change every 3 days consisting of chlorhexidine cleansing, non-sterile silver-impregnated foam with overlying clear dressing, and use of a driveline anchor. Follow-up was censored at first DLI, device removal, transplant or death. Additionally, Group 1 patients’ follow-up was censored when the change in protocol occurred. Statistical analysis: Student’s t-test, Fisher’s exact test, Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test.

Results: DLI occurred in 16% of 88 VAD recipients (Group 1 n=24, Group 2 n=64). The new driveline management protocol resulted in significantly fewer DLI in Group 2 (6.3% vs. 41.7%, p<0.0001)

Conclusions: An updated driveline management protocol demonstrated significant reduction in DLI at our institution. Studies evaluating the optimal approach for driveline management are needed in order to develop a standardized regimen aimed at lowering the risk of DLI.

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/VAD.2016.03

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Download

Share

COinS