Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
Abstract
Leading up to the passage of the 1996 welfare reform, there was much speculation and debate over the possibility that states would "race to the bottom" in setting welfare generosity if given more control over their individual programs. In the fifteen years after welfare reform, did such a race to the bottom ensue? Using a spatial dynamic econometric approach I investigate welfare competition across multiple policy instruments and across three distinct welfare periods - the AFDC regime, the experimental waiver period leading up to the reform, and the TANF era. Results suggest strategic policy setting occurs over multiple dimensions of welfare including the effective benefit level and the effective tax rate applied to recipient's earned income.
Document Type
Research Paper
Publication Date
9-9-2012
Discussion Paper Number
DP 2012-04
Repository Citation
Burns, Sarah K., "Was There a ‘Race to the Bottom’ After Welfare Reform?" (2012). University of Kentucky Center for Poverty Research Discussion Paper Series. 30.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ukcpr_papers/30
