Archived

This content is available here for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping.

Abstract

International human rights institutions impose obligations on their member states that extend long past the ratification stage. Each year, states receive tens, or even hundreds, of recommendations from international human rights bodies. These recommendations demand that states change their human rights policies and practices. While recent scholarship has emphasized the important role of domestic institutions and civil society actors in facilitating compliance with these recommendations, comparatively little research examines how the quality of the recommendations themselves affects compliance outcomes. Using two novel datasets, this paper sets out to understand the nexus between recommendation quality and compliance. Our research suggests that highly precise recommendations move the needle away from inaction on international human rights institutions’ rulings and recommendations but make full compliance more difficult. This paper advances the existing literature on the dynamics of compliance and places some of the responsibility for compliance on the international human rights institutions themselves.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-1-2025

Notes/Citation Information

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) (2024). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1093/isq/sqae155

Archival?

Archival

Download

Share

COinS