Abstract
Existing literature on the behaviour of rising powers in global trade governance has yielded inconclusive evidence about their role and impact. This article contributes to this literature by examining China's role in global digital trade governance, an issue area which so far has not received sufficient scholarly attention. Specifically, it addresses the following question: as a self-proclaimed leader of the developing world in digital development, to what extent do its preferences and negotiation approach align with the interests of other developing countries? Analysing China's participation in three sets of negotiations using process tracing, the article argues that China's dual identity both as a self-identified developing country and as a rising power has contributed to its strategic ambivalence. In principle China supports a development-oriented approach to digital trade governance, calling attention to issues such as the digital divide and preserving developing countries' policy space on data localization consistent with its domestic regulatory approaches. Yet China's interest in promoting Chinese technology firms' global expansion leads to increasing divergence with other developing countries on issues such as the e-commerce customs duty moratorium and the global taxation of digital firms, paradoxically increasing its interest alignment with developed countries and limiting its support for fundamental reforms.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-2024
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae177
Funding Information
This project was partially supported by the University of Kentucky OPVR CURATE Grant and the Southeastern Conference faculty travel award.
Repository Citation
He, Yujia and Zeng, Ka, "China in global digital trade governance: towards a development-oriented agenda?" (2024). Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce Faculty Publications. 9.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/patterson_facpub/9
Included in
Asian Studies Commons, Development Studies Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Global Studies Commons, International Business Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons

Notes/Citation Information
Published in International Affairs, v.100, no.5, p. 2195-2215