Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
Abstract
Libricide, although often deemed an extreme instance of censorship, is altogether different. Censorship involves the suppression of particular books due to alleged inappropriate content; libricide refers to the intentional destruction of entire libraries. Understanding the differing motives recognizes that the library is more than the books it contains, and is instead an institution rooted in its history of selection and use by the local community. Over time, the library reflects the users’ identity, a reminder that any aggressor would wish to eliminate when the goal is pacification by erasure of a population’s memory and history. Prerequisites for an act of libricide—the spread of the access-for public library, the rise of an international movement for heritage preservation, and belief in the library as a site of collective memory—identify the first true act of libricide, the 1914 destruction of the Louvain Library.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2024
2024
Repository Citation
Donovan, James M., "More than Censorship: The Harm of Libricide" (2024). Law Faculty Scholarly Articles. 776.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub/776
Included in
Cultural History Commons, Library and Information Science Commons, Multicultural Psychology Commons, Sociology of Culture Commons
Notes/Citation Information
James M. Donovan, More than Censorship: The Harm of Libricide, 8(1) LIBRARIES: CULTURE, HISTORY, AND SOCIETY 1-21 (2024).