Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
Abstract
That property is more than mere dirt, brush, or rugged terrain is made obvious by the fervor with which individuals will defend their right to inhabit or use that property. Property can be valuable to individuals for myriad reasons, including an ancestral connection to the property; "historic, religious, and cultural significance;" or emotional attachment. The desire to preserve the right to use property or to protect it from environmental harm can create atypical activists, such as the Sisters of Loretto in Kentucky. The sisters opposed the construction of the pipeline across their pristine property and voiced their disapproval of the pipeline in community meetings and in a petition to the Governor.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2018
Repository Citation
Hazelwood, Kristin J., "Pipelines, Electrical Lines, and Little Pink Houses: Do Any Limits on "Public Use" Remain in Eminent Domain Law?" (2018). Law Faculty Scholarly Articles. 756.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub/756
Notes/Citation Information
Kristin J. Hazelwood, Pipelines, Electrical Lines, and Little Pink Houses: Do Any Limits On “Public Use” Remain in Eminent Domain Law?, 25 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 711 (2018).