Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
Abstract
Professor Underwood offers a critique of the present state of scientific and forensic evidence. In the context of discussing four challenges to the field, the author arms the practitioner with strategies and tactics for making effective use of scientific and forensic testimony.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Summer 2000
6-22-2012
Repository Citation
Richard H. Underwood, Evaluating Scientific and Forensic Evidence, 24 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 149 (2000).
Notes/Citation Information
American Journal of Trial Advocacy, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Summer 2000), pp. 149-194