Abstract
The objective of this study was to find the most cost-effective durable marking material to provide long-lasting stop bars and crossbars. Three materials were tested: 1) 3M Stamark tape, 2) Prismo preformed tape, and 3) extruded thermoplastic (hydrocarbon and alkyd). The various test installations were in place for between 6 and 30 months.
The alkyd-resin thermoplastic material was found to be the most cost-effective I material. The preformed tapes cost two to three times as much as the thermoplastic material while not providing as durable a material when used in this application.The alkyd-resin material maintained its appearance better than the hydrocarbon-resin material.
Use of alkyd-resin extruded thermoplastic material was recommended either by contract or with Kentucky Transportation Cabinet personnel if the necessary equipment was obtained. The exceptions where preformed tape shall be used were 1) at isolated intersections where use of thermoplastic installation equipment was impractical and 2) on concrete pavements.
Report Date
5-1986
Report Number
UKTRP-86-13
Digital Object Identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/KTC.RR.1986.13
Repository Citation
Agent, Kenneth R. and Pigman, Jerry G., "Evaluation of Durable Crosswalk and Stopbar Marking Materials" (1986). Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report. 559.
https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ktc_researchreports/559
Notes
The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the University of Kentucky, the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, nor the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The inclusion of manufacturer names and tradenames are for identification purposes and are not to be considered as endorsements.