Track 2-02: Assessment of Grassland Condition, Stability and Sustainability
Description
Sward height is often used as a tool for both animal and pasture management, especially when continuously grazing pasture. For example, sward height has been used to define the conditions for optimal feed intake of multiple-bearing ewes, both before and after lambing (Everett-Hincks et al.2005; Morris and Kenyon 2004). Sward height is easily applied by the grazier and so becomes an effective tool. However, changes in the leaf distribution and relative species makeup of the sward both seasonally (Thomson et al. 2001) and in response to grazing management (Webby and Pengelly 1986) mean that the amount of pasture per unit height will change. When these changes occur a dilemma is presented to the grazier. How do they manage the trade-off between a simple indicator for management decisions and the lost opportunity of harvesting pasture mass that may be accumulating below the assigned sward height?
This paper presents data from an experiment that investigated the impacts of defoliation strategies on sward of differing starting masses, with defoliation management based on height rather than mass. The paper quantifies the accumulation of herbage below defoliation height and highlights the dilemma of using sward height as a management tool when aiming to maximise the utilisation of our pasture resource.
Included in
The Dilemma of Using Sward Height as a Management Tool for Intensively Grazed Sheep Pasture in Spring
Sward height is often used as a tool for both animal and pasture management, especially when continuously grazing pasture. For example, sward height has been used to define the conditions for optimal feed intake of multiple-bearing ewes, both before and after lambing (Everett-Hincks et al.2005; Morris and Kenyon 2004). Sward height is easily applied by the grazier and so becomes an effective tool. However, changes in the leaf distribution and relative species makeup of the sward both seasonally (Thomson et al. 2001) and in response to grazing management (Webby and Pengelly 1986) mean that the amount of pasture per unit height will change. When these changes occur a dilemma is presented to the grazier. How do they manage the trade-off between a simple indicator for management decisions and the lost opportunity of harvesting pasture mass that may be accumulating below the assigned sward height?
This paper presents data from an experiment that investigated the impacts of defoliation strategies on sward of differing starting masses, with defoliation management based on height rather than mass. The paper quantifies the accumulation of herbage below defoliation height and highlights the dilemma of using sward height as a management tool when aiming to maximise the utilisation of our pasture resource.
