Track 2-01: The Ecology of Grassland and Forage Ecosystems

Description

Land degradation in South African rangelands has frequently been studied in the context of tenure systems, because both governmental policy and range management practices were historically implemented in contrasting forms. We compared the functional response of vegetation along grazing gradients between a communal (CU) and commercial (CO) farming areas. One transect was established per farm from the waterpoint to a mid-field position. Six equally spaced plots (5 m × 5 m) were set up along each transect. Using a taxon-free sampling procedure, we recorded the response of 15 community-aggregated plant functional traits (CPFT) in: (1) mature standing biomass; and (2) after four weeks’ regrowth following clipping. Additionally, species identity was recorded. Grazing on CU was continuous and stocking rate not controlled, while CO applied rotational grazing with recommended stocking rates. From the results, CPFT differences were not significant (Student’s t-test, P < 0.01) between tenure systems. A principal component analysis of CPFT showed largely overlapping functional responses in the two tenure systems in the case of mature standing biomass, while the functional response of regrowing vegetation was clearly separated in the ordination space. Communal rangelands had twice the species richness of commercial farms.We concluded that, from a functional perspective, communities under different tenure systems were similar. However, the functional response of vegetation regrowth might be different as well as the ecological services provided (biodiversity).

Share

COinS
 

Functional Responses of South African Rangelands in Contrasting Tenure Systems

Land degradation in South African rangelands has frequently been studied in the context of tenure systems, because both governmental policy and range management practices were historically implemented in contrasting forms. We compared the functional response of vegetation along grazing gradients between a communal (CU) and commercial (CO) farming areas. One transect was established per farm from the waterpoint to a mid-field position. Six equally spaced plots (5 m × 5 m) were set up along each transect. Using a taxon-free sampling procedure, we recorded the response of 15 community-aggregated plant functional traits (CPFT) in: (1) mature standing biomass; and (2) after four weeks’ regrowth following clipping. Additionally, species identity was recorded. Grazing on CU was continuous and stocking rate not controlled, while CO applied rotational grazing with recommended stocking rates. From the results, CPFT differences were not significant (Student’s t-test, P < 0.01) between tenure systems. A principal component analysis of CPFT showed largely overlapping functional responses in the two tenure systems in the case of mature standing biomass, while the functional response of regrowing vegetation was clearly separated in the ordination space. Communal rangelands had twice the species richness of commercial farms.We concluded that, from a functional perspective, communities under different tenure systems were similar. However, the functional response of vegetation regrowth might be different as well as the ecological services provided (biodiversity).