Publication Date

1989

Location

Nice France

Description

Herbage intake in grazing animals is commonly estimated from faecal dry matter output, calculated from the dilution of orally-administered chromium sesquioxide (Cr203), and an in�� vitro estimate of herbage digestibility (e.g., Freer et al. 1988). A major disadvantage of this approach is that a single digesti­bility value is ultimately applied to all the animals in a group, despite the fact that both the level of intake of individual ani­mals and the consumption of supplement can alter herbage digestibility (Waite et al. 1964). More recently, Mayes et al.(1986) obtained accrurate estimates of known herbage, from a combination of the faecal levels of the n-hydrocarbons (alkanes) of plant cuticular waxes (predominantly odd­numbered carbon chain length) and those of orally-admini­stered synthetic alkanes (even-numbered chain lengths). Neither type of alkane is wholly indigestible but, since alkanes of adjacent chain length have very similar faecal recoveries, the errors arising from incomplete recoveries cancel out in the cal­culcation of intake (Mayes et al. 1986). A major advantage of this method is that it reflects the digestibility in individual animals. It is thus well suited to grazing situations where levels of intake may differ between treatments or where supplements are used in some treatments. In this paper, we report the results of a comparison of these two methods for estimating herbage intake, conducted with grazing ewes.

Share

COinS
 

Estimation of Pasture Intake in Grazing Ewes, Using the Alkanes of Plant Cuticular Waxes

Nice France

Herbage intake in grazing animals is commonly estimated from faecal dry matter output, calculated from the dilution of orally-administered chromium sesquioxide (Cr203), and an in�� vitro estimate of herbage digestibility (e.g., Freer et al. 1988). A major disadvantage of this approach is that a single digesti­bility value is ultimately applied to all the animals in a group, despite the fact that both the level of intake of individual ani­mals and the consumption of supplement can alter herbage digestibility (Waite et al. 1964). More recently, Mayes et al.(1986) obtained accrurate estimates of known herbage, from a combination of the faecal levels of the n-hydrocarbons (alkanes) of plant cuticular waxes (predominantly odd­numbered carbon chain length) and those of orally-admini­stered synthetic alkanes (even-numbered chain lengths). Neither type of alkane is wholly indigestible but, since alkanes of adjacent chain length have very similar faecal recoveries, the errors arising from incomplete recoveries cancel out in the cal­culcation of intake (Mayes et al. 1986). A major advantage of this method is that it reflects the digestibility in individual animals. It is thus well suited to grazing situations where levels of intake may differ between treatments or where supplements are used in some treatments. In this paper, we report the results of a comparison of these two methods for estimating herbage intake, conducted with grazing ewes.