Publication Date

1989

Location

Nice France

Description

Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm. is a perennial, sod-form­ing shortgrass of central North America (Hitchcock, 1951), thriving under semiarid conditions and increasing under mod­erate to heavy grazing (Quinn, 1987). The species is largely dioecious, and sex ratios are either 1 : 1 or female-biased (Quinn and Engel, 1986). Isolated plants under controlled conditions are strictly male, strictly female, or monoecious (0 to 20 %, depending on the population). Over the last half-century, buffalograss has been widely used in central North America for reseeding depleted rangelands and for erosion control (Quinn, 1985), and recently it has received renewed attention as a turf species (C.R. Funk, per­sonal communication, 1988). The efforts of breeders to develop varieties whose seeds produce more females than males (Quinn, 1985) and the testing and use of vegetatively-propagated clones (C.R. Funk, personal communication, 1988) raise questions as to whether females are more productive and/or better forage plants or whether males and females differ in competitiveness or in site preference. Because certain genotypes are slow to flower, a secondary aim was to determine if vegetative char­acters could be used to identify the sex prior to flowering.

Share

COinS
 

Sex Linkage of Growth and Forage Attributes in Buffalograss (Buchloe dactyloides)

Nice France

Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm. is a perennial, sod-form­ing shortgrass of central North America (Hitchcock, 1951), thriving under semiarid conditions and increasing under mod­erate to heavy grazing (Quinn, 1987). The species is largely dioecious, and sex ratios are either 1 : 1 or female-biased (Quinn and Engel, 1986). Isolated plants under controlled conditions are strictly male, strictly female, or monoecious (0 to 20 %, depending on the population). Over the last half-century, buffalograss has been widely used in central North America for reseeding depleted rangelands and for erosion control (Quinn, 1985), and recently it has received renewed attention as a turf species (C.R. Funk, per­sonal communication, 1988). The efforts of breeders to develop varieties whose seeds produce more females than males (Quinn, 1985) and the testing and use of vegetatively-propagated clones (C.R. Funk, personal communication, 1988) raise questions as to whether females are more productive and/or better forage plants or whether males and females differ in competitiveness or in site preference. Because certain genotypes are slow to flower, a secondary aim was to determine if vegetative char­acters could be used to identify the sex prior to flowering.