Archived
This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.
Publication Date
1981
Description
Forage allocation to mixtures of large herbivores is accomplished by minimizing the difference between the available herbage and the required forage for animals on rangeland. Availability is determined in part by the plant's physiological tolerance to grazing or its allowable-use factor and the animal preference for that plant, measured in part by the proper-use factor. The mix of large herbivores on the rangeland must also be considered. The grazing requirements for animals are dependent on animal preference for plant species and on the total forage intake rates. This paper presents an analysis of these concepts and published information. The concept of proper-use factor is widespread, but published methodologies for its formulation are lacking. Allowable-use factors, determined primarily in clipping studies, are generally higher than proper-use factors, but the exact relationship between them is unclear at best. Preference for plants by herbivores, as def'med in the literature, varies in meaning from percentage eaten by forage class (grasses, forbs, and shrubs) to rankings by percent of plant species in herbivore diets to actual calculation of a preference index. The method used to calculate a preference index can yield varying results and interpretations. Forage intake-rate studies that use animals while grazing rather than under pen conditions appear to be confined to domestic sheep and cattle. Some 52 intake-rate values for cattle averaged 2.2% of body weight/day; 53 intake-rate values for sheep averaged the same. We also report forage intake rates for pronghorn antelope, bison, bighorn sheep, mule deer, horses, and elk. Through understanding of these variables, effective management strategies may be derived whereby the rangeland resource can be used prudently without degradation.
Citation
Skiles, J E. and Van Dyne, G M., "Evaluation of Biological Components in Decision-Making in Forage Allocation" (1981). IGC Proceedings (1981-2023). 6.
(URL: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/1981/section5/6)
Archival?
Archival
Included in
Agricultural Science Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, Plant Pathology Commons, Soil Science Commons, Weed Science Commons
Evaluation of Biological Components in Decision-Making in Forage Allocation
Forage allocation to mixtures of large herbivores is accomplished by minimizing the difference between the available herbage and the required forage for animals on rangeland. Availability is determined in part by the plant's physiological tolerance to grazing or its allowable-use factor and the animal preference for that plant, measured in part by the proper-use factor. The mix of large herbivores on the rangeland must also be considered. The grazing requirements for animals are dependent on animal preference for plant species and on the total forage intake rates. This paper presents an analysis of these concepts and published information. The concept of proper-use factor is widespread, but published methodologies for its formulation are lacking. Allowable-use factors, determined primarily in clipping studies, are generally higher than proper-use factors, but the exact relationship between them is unclear at best. Preference for plants by herbivores, as def'med in the literature, varies in meaning from percentage eaten by forage class (grasses, forbs, and shrubs) to rankings by percent of plant species in herbivore diets to actual calculation of a preference index. The method used to calculate a preference index can yield varying results and interpretations. Forage intake-rate studies that use animals while grazing rather than under pen conditions appear to be confined to domestic sheep and cattle. Some 52 intake-rate values for cattle averaged 2.2% of body weight/day; 53 intake-rate values for sheep averaged the same. We also report forage intake rates for pronghorn antelope, bison, bighorn sheep, mule deer, horses, and elk. Through understanding of these variables, effective management strategies may be derived whereby the rangeland resource can be used prudently without degradation.
