Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Presenter Information

Publication Date

1981

Description

Grasses of temperate regions of the world belong primarily to the subfamily Festucoideae, whereas tropical regions are populated by tribes of the Panicoideae subfamily. Temperate grasses have a C3 biochemical pathway of photosynthesis in con­trast to tropical grasses, which have a C4 photosynthetic mechan-ism. Both tropical and temperate legumes are C3 plants. Com­patible mixtures of legumes and grasses have long been successful in many temperate regions, but combining C4 grasses and C3 legumes as mixtures in the tropics has been only moderately successful. Maximum net primary productions of temperate and tropical grasslands are in the order of 25 and 80 tons/ha/yr, respec­tively. Thirty tons/ha/yr is considered an exceptionally high yield in the wet-dry tropics, and no more than 10 to 15 tons/ha/yr can be expected at 40° N latitude. Rates of conversion of net primary production to animal yield in temperate and tropical grasslands are quite different. Although net primary production in tropical grasslands may be several times that of the most productive temperate grasslands, a much smaller proportion of the production may be recovered by the grazing animal. Animal yields/ha/yr on high-producing cultivated temperate and tropical pastures seldom exceed 1,000 kg. Failure of tropical pastures to give higher yields of meat and milk commensurate with their greater net primary production can be partially accounted for by much greater losses in the graz­ing process. Other factors are lower daily intake of energy above maintenance, which results in a much larger proportion of the energy consumed/ha being expended for maintenance than for performance. It is concluded that more nearly maximum yields of animal product for any particular environmental circumstance will be at­tainable when management schemes are devised to match feed supply with demand and to recover maximum net primary pro­duction mutually beneficial to both pasture and animal. Other strategies include improving the quality of consumed forage by genetic manipulation, developing legume and grass cultiva:rs that will coexist in mixtures, conserving forages, and supplying the mineral requirements of the grazing animals.

Share

COinS
 

Potential Productivity of Temperate and Tropical Grassland Systems

Grasses of temperate regions of the world belong primarily to the subfamily Festucoideae, whereas tropical regions are populated by tribes of the Panicoideae subfamily. Temperate grasses have a C3 biochemical pathway of photosynthesis in con­trast to tropical grasses, which have a C4 photosynthetic mechan-ism. Both tropical and temperate legumes are C3 plants. Com­patible mixtures of legumes and grasses have long been successful in many temperate regions, but combining C4 grasses and C3 legumes as mixtures in the tropics has been only moderately successful. Maximum net primary productions of temperate and tropical grasslands are in the order of 25 and 80 tons/ha/yr, respec­tively. Thirty tons/ha/yr is considered an exceptionally high yield in the wet-dry tropics, and no more than 10 to 15 tons/ha/yr can be expected at 40° N latitude. Rates of conversion of net primary production to animal yield in temperate and tropical grasslands are quite different. Although net primary production in tropical grasslands may be several times that of the most productive temperate grasslands, a much smaller proportion of the production may be recovered by the grazing animal. Animal yields/ha/yr on high-producing cultivated temperate and tropical pastures seldom exceed 1,000 kg. Failure of tropical pastures to give higher yields of meat and milk commensurate with their greater net primary production can be partially accounted for by much greater losses in the graz­ing process. Other factors are lower daily intake of energy above maintenance, which results in a much larger proportion of the energy consumed/ha being expended for maintenance than for performance. It is concluded that more nearly maximum yields of animal product for any particular environmental circumstance will be at­tainable when management schemes are devised to match feed supply with demand and to recover maximum net primary pro­duction mutually beneficial to both pasture and animal. Other strategies include improving the quality of consumed forage by genetic manipulation, developing legume and grass cultiva:rs that will coexist in mixtures, conserving forages, and supplying the mineral requirements of the grazing animals.