Theme 12: Forage Breeding and Genetics

Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Publication Date

2001

Location

Brazil

Description

The responsiveness to water availability in summer and the effect of summer drought were assessed in a Mediterranean environment on both temperate and Mediterranean cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) materials. Three consecutive evaluation phases were contemplated: i) under rainfed conditions from autumn to spring; ii) under contrasting moisture conditions in the following summer; and iii) under rainfed conditions in the subsequent autumn-spring season to assess the effect of the previous summer treatments. The ability to become summer dormant under conducive conditions, such as in Mediterranean germplasm, proved a plant pre-requisite for survival under drought. All the “summer-active”, temperate varieties did not survive drought stress. Mediterranean materials showed a facultative dormancy behaviour in that they responded to moisture availability in summer. There was evidence that selection for such responsiveness was effective, as shown by a variety selected from Mediterranean germplasm also considering this criterion. Forcing summer growth by preventing dormancy had little detrimental effect on subsequent autumn recovery of Mediterranean improved varieties but more evidence is required on this aspect.

Share

COinS
 

Response of Contrasting Cocksfoot Varieties to Summer Moisture Availability in a Mediterranean Environment

Brazil

The responsiveness to water availability in summer and the effect of summer drought were assessed in a Mediterranean environment on both temperate and Mediterranean cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) materials. Three consecutive evaluation phases were contemplated: i) under rainfed conditions from autumn to spring; ii) under contrasting moisture conditions in the following summer; and iii) under rainfed conditions in the subsequent autumn-spring season to assess the effect of the previous summer treatments. The ability to become summer dormant under conducive conditions, such as in Mediterranean germplasm, proved a plant pre-requisite for survival under drought. All the “summer-active”, temperate varieties did not survive drought stress. Mediterranean materials showed a facultative dormancy behaviour in that they responded to moisture availability in summer. There was evidence that selection for such responsiveness was effective, as shown by a variety selected from Mediterranean germplasm also considering this criterion. Forcing summer growth by preventing dormancy had little detrimental effect on subsequent autumn recovery of Mediterranean improved varieties but more evidence is required on this aspect.