Document Type
Article
Abstract
The leaching potential of coal fly ash is often approximated with laboratory-based methods that expose columns of compacted material to synthetic precipitation. While this procedure can simulate aspects of the field condition, it remains difficult to replicate site-specific thermodynamic and kinetic constraints on geochemical processes. This article explores one aspect that contributes to the field/laboratory disparity, namely, the influence of flow rate and intermittency. Seven column-based leaching experiments were conducted with the same ash but with different flow rates and intermittency (i.e., infiltration pulsing), and results were evaluated in terms of aqueous sodium, calcium, and chromium concentrations in the effluent. Flow rates ranged by three orders of magnitude, encompassing advection- and diffusion-dominated conditions as determined by Peclet number calculations. With few exceptions, the results revealed diminishing leachate concentrations with continued flushing, consistent with a declining source model. Notwithstanding differences in effluent concentration as a function of pore volume, general mass release followed similar patterns that likely reflected solubility control. Higher liquid-to-solid ratios revealed potentially nonequilibrium behavior at the highest flow rate (2400 mL/day) during intermittent flow conditions for chromium and calcium, and to a modest extent for sodium. The primary conclusion from this work is that for the constituents and ash tested, there was relatively little effect of flow rate or intermittency on leachability patterns.
First Page
34
Last Page
40
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4177/CCGP-D-18-00004.1
Volume
10
Publication Date
1-1-2018
Recommended Citation
Daniels, John L., and Gautham P. Das. 2018. “Influence of Flow Rate on Leachability.” Coal Combustion and Gasification Products 10 (3): 34–40. https://doi.org/10.4177/CCGP-D-18-00004.1.
Included in
Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Geological Engineering Commons