Archived

This content is available here strictly for research, reference, and/or recordkeeping and as such it may not be fully accessible. If you work or study at University of Kentucky and would like to request an accessible version, please use the SensusAccess Document Converter.

Abstract

Background: Patient adherence to home exercise programs (HEPs) is low, and poor patient self-efficacy is a barrier clinicians can influence. However, little evidence suggests that clinicians assess level of patient self-efficacy before prescribing HEPs.

Purpose: To determine the importance of patient self-efficacy to physical therapists (PTs) when addressing patient barriers, determine how PTs assess and use patient self-efficacy for HEPs, and describe the barriers facing PTs when assessing patient self-efficacy for HEPs.

Study Design: Survey.

Methods: Practicing PTs were recruited from the American Physical Therapy Association's Orthopedic Section and emailed the electronic survey.

Results: Email invitations were sent to 17730 potential participants, and 462 PTs completed the survey over one month. PTs rated self-efficacy as "very" to "extremely" important for patient adherence (58%, 265/454). Most (71%, 328/462) reported assessing self-efficacy before prescribing HEPs and did so through verbal discussion and observation of the patient (50% and 38% respectively). Half of respondents individualized HEPs through self-efficacy related themes. PTs not assessing self-efficacy reported not knowing how (51%, 68/134), being unsure what to do with the information (24%, 32/134), or reporting other barriers (21%, 28/134).

Conclusions: Most PTs indicated that self-efficacy was important for patient adherence, but assessment strategies reported, such as verbal discussion and observation, may not be the most accurate. PTs who did not assess self-efficacy reported not knowing how or what to do with the information once collected. These findings suggest that there is a gap in knowledge related to how to evaluate self-efficacy for HEPs. Better assessment of self-efficacy may lead to more appropriate and effective implementation strategies.

Level of Evidence: Level II.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2-1-2021

Notes/Citation Information

Published in International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, v. 16, issue 1.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND-4.0). View this license’s legal deed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 and legal code at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode for more information.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.18957

fig1.jpg (382 kB)
Table 1: Participant characteristics (n = 462)

fig2.jpg (477 kB)
Table 2: Friedman test results of what physical therapists observe to be barriers to patient exercise adherence

figure_3.jpg (1273 kB)
Table 3: Friedman test results of what physical therapists believe the most negatively influential to patient exercise adherence

table-1-participant-characteristics-n-462.html (2 kB)
Table 4: Themes extracted on how physical therapists individualize home exercise programs based on self-efficacy assessment

table-2-friedman-test-results-of-what-physical-therapists-observe-to-be-barriers-to-patient-exercise-adherence.html (3 kB)
Figure 1: Physical therapists perceived importance of self-efficacy

table-3-friedman-test-results-of-what-physical-therapists-believe-the-most-negatively-influential-to-patient-exercise-adherence.html (3 kB)
Figure 2: Methods of self-efficacy assessment used by physical therapists

table-4-themes-extracted-on-how-physical-therapists-individualize-home-exercise-programs-based-on-self-efficacy-assessment.html (3 kB)
Figure 3: Physical therapist’s barriers to self-efficacy assessment

Share

COinS