Description
Grazing cover crops has the potential to offset costs incurred with cover crop establishment, thus incentivizing management adoption. Information regarding cover crop species in combination with grazing and their subsequent effects on soybean production is limited. A field trial was conducted in Newton, MS from 2019 to 2021 to assess these effects. Cover crop treatments included oats (O), O + crimson clover (OC), and OC + radish (OCR) were applied in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Cover crops differed in nutritive analysis; O had significantly lower mean CP, but greater total daily nutrients (TDN). Weaned beef steers grazing cover crops had lower ADG in the OCR treatment (3.03 lb hd-1 d-1), compared to O (3.52 lb hd-1 d-1) and OC (3.55 lb hd-1 d-1). No significant difference was observed in soybean grain yield between cover crop treatments. Mean yields were 51.1, 46.1, and 38.7 bu ac-1 for the O, OC, and OCR treatments, respectively. Total net returns for grazing plus soybean production were significantly lower in the OCR ($817.51 ac-1), compared to the O ($1,107.03 ac-1) and OC ($1,071.15 ac-1) treatments. These returns suggest that grazing provides an added value to cover crop establishment and provides incentives for increased revenue for producers willing to combine livestock and row crop enterprises.
Included in
Agricultural Science Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, Plant Pathology Commons, Soil Science Commons, Weed Science Commons
The Effects of Grazing Cover Crops on Animal Performance and Soybean Production
Grazing cover crops has the potential to offset costs incurred with cover crop establishment, thus incentivizing management adoption. Information regarding cover crop species in combination with grazing and their subsequent effects on soybean production is limited. A field trial was conducted in Newton, MS from 2019 to 2021 to assess these effects. Cover crop treatments included oats (O), O + crimson clover (OC), and OC + radish (OCR) were applied in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Cover crops differed in nutritive analysis; O had significantly lower mean CP, but greater total daily nutrients (TDN). Weaned beef steers grazing cover crops had lower ADG in the OCR treatment (3.03 lb hd-1 d-1), compared to O (3.52 lb hd-1 d-1) and OC (3.55 lb hd-1 d-1). No significant difference was observed in soybean grain yield between cover crop treatments. Mean yields were 51.1, 46.1, and 38.7 bu ac-1 for the O, OC, and OCR treatments, respectively. Total net returns for grazing plus soybean production were significantly lower in the OCR ($817.51 ac-1), compared to the O ($1,107.03 ac-1) and OC ($1,071.15 ac-1) treatments. These returns suggest that grazing provides an added value to cover crop establishment and provides incentives for increased revenue for producers willing to combine livestock and row crop enterprises.
