Online access to this book is only available to eligible users.
Download Full Text (1.1 MB)
Is the United States Congress dead, alive, or trapped in a moribund cycle? When confronted with controversial policy issues, members of Congress struggle to satisfy conflicting legislative, representative, and oversight duties. These competing goals, along with the pressure to satisfy local constituents, cause members of Congress to routinely cede power on a variety of policies, express regret over their loss of control, and later return to the habit of delegating their power. This pattern of institutional ambivalence undermines conventional wisdom about congressional party resurgence, the power of oversight, and the return of the so-called imperial presidency. This book examines Congress's frequent delegation of power by analyzing primary source materials such as bills, committee reports, and the Congressional Record. The book demonstrates that Congress is caught between abdication and ambition and that this ambivalence affects numerous facets of the legislative process. Explaining specific instances of post-delegation disorder, including Congress's use of new bills, obstruction, public criticism, and oversight to salvage its lost power, the book exposes the tensions surrounding Congress's roles in recent hot-button issues such as base-closing commissions, presidential trade promotion authority, and responses to the attacks of September 11. It also examines shifting public rhetoric used by members of Congress as they emphasize, in institutionally self-conscious terms, the difficulties of balancing their multiple roles.
The University Press of Kentucky
Place of Publication
978-0-8131-7376-4 (pdf version)
978-0-8131-3969-2 (epub version)
United States Congress, Congress, Committee reports, Congressional Record, Power, Bills, Ambivalence, Obstruction, Base-closing commissions, Legislative process
American Politics | Political History | United States History
Farrier, Jasmine, "Congressional Ambivalence: The Political Burdens of Constitutional Authority" (2010). Political History. 26.
Consortium members may access while on their campus.