Abstract

Observations were first made at lane closures on interstate highways where yellow warning signs were erected routinely in conjunction with contract work. Later data provided direct comparison between new yellow and new orange signs. One sign scheme was used throughout the study. Driver obedience improved when new signs of either color were used; this finding implies that signs should always be maintained in good condition. Orange signs were slightly more effective than yellow signs in reducing traffic conflicts and merges near the traffic cones. The results of the study tend to support the adoption of orange as the standard color for signing construction and maintenance sites. However, the differences between the two colors were rather small. Driver preference polls supported the orange signs more strongly. A degree of driver insensitivity toward signing was shown. In general, variables such as short sight distances, high volumes, poor condition of signs, and driver insensitivity produced unsafe situations at lane closures.

Report Date

5-1972

Report Number

No. 327

Digital Object Identifier

http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/KTC.RR.1972.327

Notes

The opinions, findings, and conclusions in this report are not necessarily those of the Department of Highways or the Federal Highway Administration.

Download

Share

COinS