Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8788-0693

Date Available

5-1-2025

Year of Publication

2025

Document Type

Doctoral Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

College

Arts and Sciences

Department/School/Program

Psychology

Faculty

Dr. Rachel H. Farr

Faculty

Dr. Mike Bardo

Abstract

Despite a lifetime of systematic barriers, LGBTQ+ individuals age into late adulthood, likely due to various protective factors. Guided by the Iridescent Life Course Framework (ILCF; Fredriksen-Goldsen & Muraco, 2019), I analyzed unique protective factors at two levels: (1) individual psychological factors (i.e., resilience, identity management) and (2) community-level factors (i.e., LGBTQ+ community connectedness, social support). Health was operationalized as mental health, physical health, and health-promoting behaviors. The present study accounted for covariates (i.e., financial barriers to healthcare, felt subjective age discrepancy, lifetime discrimination). I hypothesized that both stronger individual and community factors would be associated with better physical and mental health and more engagement in health-promoting behaviors among older LGBTQ+ adults in the U.S. Additionally, I hypothesized that age cohorts (i.e., individuals between 55-64 years old, those 65 and older) would present significant group differences across protective factors, such that younger cohorts would present greater community-level protective factors. The sample included 95 LGBTQ+ adults aged 55 years and older that lived in the U.S. Results displayed that resilience and social support were significant positive predictors of physical and psychological well-being, beyond what was explained by relevant covariates, like subjective age discrepancy and financial barriers to healthcare. Resilience was a significant positive predictor of engagement in health-promoting behaviors, after relevant factors were accounted for as covariates. Contrary to expectations, there were no significant differences between age cohorts in terms of individual or community-level protective factors. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2025.21

Funding Information

This study was supported by the University of Kentucky's Committee on Social Theory Grant in 2024.

Share

COinS