Authors

Jeffery A. Newman, University of Pittsburgh
Michael C. Cooper, University of California - Irvine
Marc Davis, University of California - Berkeley
S. M. Faber, University of California - Santa Cruz
Alison L. Coil, University of California - San Diego
Puragra Guhathakurta, University of California - Santa Cruz
David C. Koo, University of California - Santa Cruz
Andrew C. Phillips, University of California - Santa Cruz
Charlie Conroy, University of California - Santa Cruz
Aaron A. Dutton, Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Germany
Douglas P. Finkbeiner, Harvard University
Brian F. Gerke, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
David J. Rosario, Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Germany
Benjamin J. Weiner, University of Arizona
Renbin Yan, University of KentuckyFollow
Justin J. Harker, University of California - Santa Cruz
Susan A. Kassin, Goddard Space Flight Center
N. P. Konidaris, Space Telescope Science Institute
Kamson Lai, University of California - Santa Cruz
Darren S. Madgwick, University of California - Berkeley
K. G. Noeske, California Institute of Technology
Gregory D. Wirth, Keck Observatory
A. J. Connolly, University of Washington
N. Kaiser, Institute for Astronomy
Evan N. Kirby, Space Telescope Science Institute
Brian C. Lemaux, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, France
Lihwai Lin, Academia Sinica, Taiwan
Jennifer M. Lotz, California Institute of Technology
G. A. Luppino, Institute for Astronomy
C. Marinoni, Centre de Physique Theorique de Marseilles, France

Abstract

We describe the design and data analysis of the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey, the densest and largest high-precision redshift survey of galaxies at z ~ 1 completed to date. The survey was designed to conduct a comprehensive census of massive galaxies, their properties, environments, and large-scale structure down to absolute magnitude MB = –20 at z ~ 1 via ~90 nights of observation on the Keck telescope. The survey covers an area of 2.8 deg2 divided into four separate fields observed to a limiting apparent magnitude of RAB = 24.1. Objects with z ≲ 0.7 are readily identifiable using BRI photometry and rejected in three of the four DEEP2 fields, allowing galaxies with z > 0.7 to be targeted ~2.5 times more efficiently than in a purely magnitude-limited sample. Approximately 60% of eligible targets are chosen for spectroscopy, yielding nearly 53,000 spectra and more than 38,000 reliable redshift measurements. Most of the targets that fail to yield secure redshifts are blue objects that lie beyond z ~ 1.45, where the [O II] 3727 Å doublet lies in the infrared. The DEIMOS 1200 line mm–1 grating used for the survey delivers high spectral resolution (R ~ 6000), accurate and secure redshifts, and unique internal kinematic information. Extensive ancillary data are available in the DEEP2 fields, particularly in the Extended Groth Strip, which has evolved into one of the richest multiwavelength regions on the sky. This paper is intended as a handbook for users of the DEEP2 Data Release 4, which includes all DEEP2 spectra and redshifts, as well as for the DEEP2 DEIMOS data reduction pipelines. Extensive details are provided on object selection, mask design, biases in target selection and redshift measurements, the spec2d two-dimensional data-reduction pipeline, the spec1d automated redshift pipeline, and the zspec visual redshift verification process, along with examples of instrumental signatures or other artifacts that in some cases remain after data reduction. Redshift errors and catastrophic failure rates are assessed through more than 2000 objects with duplicate observations. Sky subtraction is essentially photon-limited even under bright OH sky lines; we describe the strategies that permitted this, based on high image stability, accurate wavelength solutions, and powerful B-spline modeling methods. We also investigate the impact of targets that appear to be single objects in ground-based targeting imaging but prove to be composite in Hubble Space Telescope data; they constitute several percent of targets at z ~ 1, approaching ~5%-10% at z > 1.5. Summary data are given that demonstrate the superiority of DEEP2 over other deep high-precision redshift surveys at z ~ 1 in terms of redshift accuracy, sample number density, and amount of spectral information. We also provide an overview of the scientific highlights of the DEEP2 survey thus far.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

8-29-2013

Notes/Citation Information

Published in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, v. 208, no. 1, 5, p. 1-57.

© 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A.

The copyright holder has granted the permission for posting the article here.

Due to the large number of authors, only the first 30 and the authors affiliated with the University of Kentucky are listed in the author section above. For the complete list of authors, please download this article.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/5

Funding Information

First thanks go to the W. M. Keck Foundation, the University of California, and NASA for providing funds to construct and operate the Keck telescopes. Second, we wish to thank the technical teams in the UCO/Lick Shops and at Keck Observatory for their role in building and commissioning the DEIMOS spectrograph and for their superb support during many observing runs. Funds for the spectrograph were provided by instrumentation grant ARI 92-14621 from the National Science Foundation and instrument funds from the California Association for Research in Astronomy (Keck Observatory) and from the University of California/Lick Observatory.

Due to the large number of funding sources, only the first few are listed in this section. For the complete list of funding sources, please download this article.

Share

COinS