Lawyers are under siege. We have become objects of scorn, ridicule, and occasional hatred. If you take your child to the Stephen Spielberg movie Jurassic Park, be prepared for the cheers when the cloned Tyrannosaurus Rex gobbles the lawyer—not a bad guy at all—cowering in the outhouse. In San Francisco a client burst into a California law firm and killed eight and wounded six persons before taking his own life. In response, the president of the California bar linked lawyer-bashing to hate crimes and prevailed on the Miller Brewing Company to withdraw a television commercial depicting a "lawyer-roping rodeo" in which a cowboy ropes an overweight tax lawyer playing the role of a calf—to the cheers of the Miller Lite crowd. Bizarre lawyer behavior, such as microwaving cats, adds to the problem, as does the perception that lawyers are drawn like vultures to the sites of mass disasters and are responsible for baseless law suits that drive up insurance costs.

In such a climate, lawyers should recognize that every client is a potential adversary and manage the risk by practicing defensive law. This risk management does not mean that lawyers should put their own interests ahead of their client's interests. To the contrary, the client and lawyer both benefit from defensive lawyering because the heart of the concept is accountability. Lawyers who run conflict checks, use engagement and non-engagement letters, keep their clients informed, are diligent with respect to law and fact, and refer matters beyond their competence to specialists serve both themselves and their clients well.

This article suggests that law schools and bar associations should teach professional responsibility by teaching malpractice prevention and risk management. We start with a brief overview of lawyer malpractice, then move to principles of proactive risk management, and conclude with principles of loss minimization. Special attention is given to the bar-related insurance movement and the relationship between the malpractice carrier and insured lawyer. Two appendices are provided with this article: Appendix A, a checklist for preventing legal malpractice, and Appendix B, a risk management self-assessment questionnaire.

Document Type


Publication Date

Summer 1994

Notes/Citation Information

South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Summer 1994), pp. 617-658



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.