Publication Date

1989

Description

Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm. is a perennial, sod-form­ing shortgrass of central North America (Hitchcock, 1951), thriving under semiarid conditions and increasing under mod­erate to heavy grazing (Quinn, 1987). The species is largely dioecious, and sex ratios are either 1 : 1 or female-biased (Quinn and Engel, 1986). Isolated plants under controlled conditions are strictly male, strictly female, or monoecious (0 to 20 %, depending on the population). Over the last half-century, buffalograss has been widely used in central North America for reseeding depleted rangelands and for erosion control (Quinn, 1985), and recently it has received renewed attention as a turf species (C.R. Funk, per­sonal communication, 1988). The efforts of breeders to develop varieties whose seeds produce more females than males (Quinn, 1985) and the testing and use of vegetatively-propagated clones (C.R. Funk, personal communication, 1988) raise questions as to whether females are more productive and/or better forage plants or whether males and females differ in competitiveness or in site preference. Because certain genotypes are slow to flower, a secondary aim was to determine if vegetative char­acters could be used to identify the sex prior to flowering.

Share

COinS
 

Sex Linkage of Growth and Forage Attributes in Buffalograss (Buchloe dactyloides)

Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm. is a perennial, sod-form­ing shortgrass of central North America (Hitchcock, 1951), thriving under semiarid conditions and increasing under mod­erate to heavy grazing (Quinn, 1987). The species is largely dioecious, and sex ratios are either 1 : 1 or female-biased (Quinn and Engel, 1986). Isolated plants under controlled conditions are strictly male, strictly female, or monoecious (0 to 20 %, depending on the population). Over the last half-century, buffalograss has been widely used in central North America for reseeding depleted rangelands and for erosion control (Quinn, 1985), and recently it has received renewed attention as a turf species (C.R. Funk, per­sonal communication, 1988). The efforts of breeders to develop varieties whose seeds produce more females than males (Quinn, 1985) and the testing and use of vegetatively-propagated clones (C.R. Funk, personal communication, 1988) raise questions as to whether females are more productive and/or better forage plants or whether males and females differ in competitiveness or in site preference. Because certain genotypes are slow to flower, a secondary aim was to determine if vegetative char­acters could be used to identify the sex prior to flowering.